Showing posts with label Ekadanta. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ekadanta. Show all posts

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Ganesha's childhood shenanigans 1: maternal woes

Today's snippet is the introductory benediction of a 16th century treatise on muhoorta jyotisha (electional astrology) entitled Muhoorta Chintaamani (मुहूर्तचिन्तामणि). It was penned by Daivajna Raamaachaarya (दैवज्ञरामाचार्य), an authority on said branch of astrology that deals with determining the most auspicious time for the performance of an event (recall the Hindi word muhurat).     
गौरीश्रवःकेतकपत्रभङ्गमाकृष्य हस्तेन ददन्मुखाग्रे|
   विघ्नं मुहूर्ताकलितद्वितीयदन्तप्ररोहो हरतु द्विपास्यः||
Harvard-Kyoto transliteration:
gaurIzravaHketakapatrabhaGgamAkRSya hastena dadanmukhAgre|
vighnaM muhUrtAkalitadvitIyadantapraroho haratu dvipAsyaH||


Loose translationMay the Elephant-faced One dispel obstacles as he rips away the ketaka-petal that adorns Gauree's ear with his trunk (or hand), puts it in his mouth, and (in doing so) displays for a while, as it were, the sprouting of a second tusk.

The above translation probably does not make much sense unless one is familiar with the ketaka flower. So let us take this one step at a time.

Notes:
1. The ketaka (केतक), often feminized as ketakee (केतकी), is a flowering shrub that has been celebrated (or sometimes censured) in Indic literature and mythology through the ages. Called screw pine in English (scientific name: Pandanus fascicularis), the plant is noted for its extremely strong fragrance. The flowers have large white petals, each tapering to a sharp tip and thus resembling the blade of a sword. Our poet-astrologer has compared the tip of a ketaka petal to an elephant-calf's nascent tusk, and the aptness of the comparison can be judged from the image below. I will now attempt to describe in my own words the surreal pen-picture of the divine mother-son duo that the author has painted here:
As Gauree, wearing petals of ketaka as ear-ornaments, takes her hungry elephant-headed infant up in her arms, he tears away one of those petals and starts chewing it; the white forepart of the petal sticking out of the corner of his mouth with the missing tusk (recall Ganesha's name Ekdanta, "one-tusked") gives the impression that the tusk is growing out again (and this illusion lasts only a short time since the petal is soon drawn completely into the oral cavity).
This similarity between a ketaka-petal and a tooth/tusk (the same words are used in Sanskrit to denote a tooth and a tusk) was also noted by the renowned poet Jayadeva in his magnum opus Gita Govinda
विरहिनिकृन्तनकुन्तमुखाकृतिकेतकिदन्तुरिताशे (description of the spring season)
  The quarters seem to have projecting teeth (दन्तुरित) on account of all the ketakee flowers resembling spearheads that torture (the hearts of) those separated from their lovers.
Ketaka petals and elephant tusks
source (left to right):The Mythnosis BlogWikimedia Commons

2. Our gifted author has chosen to use a rather obscure appellation of Ganesha  Dwipaasya (द्विपास्य) which means elephant-faced. It is a combination of dwipa (द्विप) which is another word for "elephant", and aasya (आस्य) which means "face". The etymology of the first word is quite interesting: it is derived from dwi (द्वि) which denotes the number "two" and the verb paa (पा), "to drink". Dwipa, thus, literally means "drinking twice", an allusion to the fact that an elephant typically sucks up water through its nostrils, and then transfers it to its mouth by bending its trunk inwards! Obviously, the first step in said process is not "drinking" per se, but the name is still justifiable if you interpret "drinking" as "sucking (liquid) in through any facial orifice" :). A synonymous (but etymologically more problematic) Sanskrit word is dwiraapa (द्विराप). 

3. In common speech, the word muhoorta (मुहूर्त), which appears here as part of the long compound muhoortaakalitadwiteeyadantapraroha (मुहूर्ताकलितद्वितीयदन्तप्ररोह), refers to any short period of time of unspecified length (and is often used in the same sense as the English words "while" or "instant") but, to be precise, it denotes a unit of measurement for time equal to the 30th part of one day (sunrise to sunrise). In astrology, the 30 muhoortas in a day all have names, mostly derived from the names of deities (there is more information on this Wikipedia page), and each one of them is considered good or bad for the performance particular events ranging from weddings to meditation.

I believe that the author deliberately (and rather deftly) included the word muhoorta in his mangalaacharana to hint in the very first verse that the following treatise would be on muhoorta jyotisha (मुहूर्तज्योतिष). Such poetic allusions or suggestions are sometimes described using the word dhwani (ध्वनि; literally, "sound"); however, according to some exponents of Sanskrit literary theory, the word dhwani has a much deeper meaning and refers to the very "soul of poetry" (the 9th century scholar Anandavardhana's "Dhwanyaaloka" introduces this concept).

4. The word patrabhanga (पत्रभङ्ग) also deserves some attention. Here, it describes a "piece broken away" (bhanga (भङ्ग)) from a "petal" (patra (पत्र)); पत्र usually denotes a leaf but can also refer to "similar" things such as the petal of a flower (the meaning which applies here), the feather of a bird, a page or letter, or even the blade of a sword or knife! However, traditionally, पत्रभङ्ग is the name given to a kind of body painting: lines or designs drawn on the face or other part of the body with musk, sandalwood-paste, or other fragrant substances (I am unaware of the details of this art form). In this sense, the word occurs quite frequently in erotic literature, and this is, in fact, the first meaning which comes to mind when a reader of Sanskrit literature encounters said word. According to at least one commentator, the word पत्रभङ्ग is inappropriate in this context, and should be replaced with something like patrabhaaga (पत्रभाग; भाग=portion/fragment). 

5. Another word to be noted is hasta (हस्त) which refers to the human hand as well as to an elephant's trunk, presumably because they perform similar functions. Both meanings apply to Ganesha, and this leaves room for some ambiguity. Personally, I prefer the meaning "trunk" because it makes the picture so much more adorable :)

6. Some other facts about the verse that I gleaned from its Sanskrit commentaries are:

  • The meter (rhythmic structure) used in the couplet is called Indravajraa (इन्द्रवज्रा). Sanskrit meter (chhandas (छन्दस्)) is a fascinating but complex topic, and I am most definitely not the right person to talk about it. The interested reader can find some information here.
  • The alankaara (अलङ्कार) or literary trope used here is adbhutopamaa (अद्भुतोपमा) or "strange comparison" (that of a ketaka petal to an elephant's burgeoning tusk).

Thursday, November 21, 2013

A mother's pride, a devotee's joy

The following is the introductory prayer of the Tantric treatise Swachchhanda Paddhati (स्वच्छन्दपद्धति) ascribed to one Chidaanandanaatha (चिदानन्दनाथ). The suffix naatha suggests that the author belonged to the famous Nath tradition of Indian ascetics.  
अगजाननपद्मार्कं गजाननमहर्निशम्|
अनेकदं तं भक्तानामेकदन्तमुपास्महे||
Harvard-Kyoto transliteration:
agajAnanapadmArkaM gajAnanamaharnizam|
anekadaM taM bhaktAnAmekadantamupAsmahe||

Loose translationWe always worship him who is a sun unto the face-lotus of the Moutain-born (i.e. Parvati), has the face of an elephant, is the giver of many (boons) to his devotees, and has a single tusk.  

Let us take this one word at a time:

1. agajaananapadmaarka (अगजाननपद्मार्क) breaks down as 
अगजा (the daughter of a mountain) + आनन (face) + पद्म (lotus) + अर्क (the Sun).
Agajaa, as already explained in "A paradoxical doxology 1", is one of the names of Ganesha's mother Parvati who is the daughter of Himavaan, the presiding deity of the Himalayas. To understand the rest of this long compound, one needs to know the relationship between the Sun and lotuses in Sanskrit literature in particular and Indian culture in general.

Ancient Indians divided lotuses (and similar aquatic flowers such as water-lilies) into two broad categories: those that unfurl their petals at sunrise and close them at night, and those that do the opposite. Unless otherwise stated, any Sanskrit word that is usually translated to English as "lotus" (for example, padma (पद्म), kamala (कमल), abja (अब्ज) etc.) refers to the former, i. e. diurnal, variety. For this reason, the Sun is very often associated with lotuses in literature and religious iconography. In most artistic portrayals, the sun god is seen holding at least one lotus in one of his hands (often two lotuses in two of his four hands), for which he is also called Abjahasta (अब्जहस्त) or Padmakara (पद्मकर), "lotus-handed". Moreover, any compound formed by prefixing any word which means "lotus" (like padma) or a "group of lotuses" (like padminee (पद्मिनी)) to any word which means "lord/husband/lover" (like pati (पति)) or "friend" (like bandhu (बन्धु)), is a valid word for the Sun in Sanskrit. Examples include Ambujabaandhava (अम्बुजबान्धव), Kamalineekaanta (कमलिनीकान्त), Padmineevallabha (पद्मिनीवल्लभ), and many more. 

The sun god Surya holding two stylized lotuses, British Museum

This association of the Sun with the opening of lotus buds is also the origin of the following literary trope in Indic literature: if X is the cause of the "blossoming" of Y,  where Y is any individual or community or suchlike, and "blossoming" figuratively refers to happiness or prosperity, then Y may be compared to a lotus and X to the Sun. For instance, Alexander the Great could be nicknamed "Macedon-lotus-sun"! In the above quote, Ganesha has been called his mother's "face-lotus-sun" for her countenance surely lights up in joy whenever he appears before her.

2. gajaanana (गजानन) or "elephant-faced" is a popular name of Ganesha.

3. aharnisham (अहर्निशम्) means "day (अहर्) and night (निशा)", hence "always". The suffix म् is the usual way of forming an adverb from a noun or adjective.

4. anekadaM taM bhaktaanaam (अनेकदं तं भक्तानाम्): Tam (तं) simply means "him" and bhaktaanaam anekadam is "much-giver to devotees." Aneka literally translates to "not-one" and the suffix da (द) derives from the verb daa (दा), "to give".

5. ekadanta (एकदन्त), "one-tusked", is another commonplace descriptor of Ganesha. It alludes to the fact that, in most standard depictions, the elephant-headed god has one tusk intact while all that is left of the other is a small cylindrical stump; he is sometimes also shown sporting the broken tusk in the grip of one of his hands. It is said that the single tusk is symbolic of Ganesha's association with the Advaita philosophy, sometimes called "non-dualism" or "monism" in English. However, there are several mythological stories that seek to provide less spiritual explanations of Ganesha's missing tusk, the most popular one being that Parashurama chopped it off with his famous axe. You can read more about it here

As the popularity of Ganesha grew, multiple manifestations called roopas (रूप) and incarnations called avataaras (अवतार) of the deity began to emerge particularly within the Ganapatya sect  the sect that worships Ganapati as the Supreme Being  and what had merely been different names of the one and only Ganesha came to be applied to his particular forms. According to the Mudgala Purana, Ekadanta is the second of the eight incarnations of Ganesha and was manifested in order to kill the demon Madaasura (मदासुर). Ekadanta Ganapati also refers to two distinct forms of the god mentioned in separate traditions: one blue-black in complexion (the twenty-second of the thirty-two forms of Ganapati recognized in the 19th century treatise Shreetattvanidhi) and the other red-skinned! Details are available in this compilation by the Kamakoti Mandali (Sanskrit descriptions in Devanagari on pages 6 and 14,  Roman transliterations on pages 37 and 48 respectively).



Ekadanta Ganapati, Shreetattvanidhi
(N.B. All illustrations of forms of Ganapati in this manuscript have a fair complexion but the text clearly states that the color of the above form is blue-black.)
source: Wikipedia

6. upaasmahe (उपास्महे) means "we worship"; the underlying verbal root is upa-aas (उप-आस्) which literally means "to sit near", hence "to wait upon", hence "to pay homage to".

Notes:
The appeal of today's quote undoubtedly lies in its wordplay: there is a yamaka (यमक) in each half-verse (I introduced the yamaka in my post "A paradoxical doxology 2")! As a quick reminder, yamaka refers to the presence of two or more strings of syllables, that sound identical but differ entirely in meaning, close to one another; in fact, one (or more) of said strings might actually be a non-isolable component of a bigger sequence, the whole of which must be considered for it to make sense. 

Here, in the first line, the string gajaanana (गजानन) appears twice, first as part of the adjective agajaananapadmaarka (अगजाननपद्मार्क), and then as a word in its own right to denote Ganesha. In the second hemistich, a similar role is played by the string ekadanta (एकदन्त):  its first occurrence is as part of the two-word sequence anekadaM taM (अन्-एकदं तम्), and the second is as an independent word. It must be noted that visually the last two strings mentioned do not look quite the same. Indeed, the anusvaara (अनुस्वार) or bindu (बिन्दु) – here, the dot above the da () in anekadaM (अनेकदं))  is a pronunciation-modifier that in general denotes a nasalization of the vowel to which it is attached; but it can alternatively be pronounced as a constantal na (न्) if followed immediately by any of the dental consonants ta (त), tha (थ), da (द), dha (ध) or na  (न). Going by this alternative pronunciation, it is easy to see how this is an example of the yamaka alankaara.