Showing posts with label Shiva. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shiva. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

A quick note

Before the next real post, I thought I should draw your attention to a variant of the excerpt in "A paradoxical doxology 1" that I came across in a couple of Vijayanagara inscriptions (of the reign of Tirumala I and Ranga Raya II). It differs from said verse only in the last quarter: instead of harinaapi cha poojyate (हरिणापि च पूज्यते), it reads panchaasyenaapi laalitam (पञ्चास्येनापि लालितम्) which means "caressed by a lion/caressed by Shiva", [panchaasya = panchaanana = "five-faced", literally]. The exegesis of this version is  quite understandably similar to that of the second quote in the same vein (A paradoxical doxology 2).

Another point to be noted is that all adjectives used to describe Ganesha in both versions of the stanza under consideration are in the neuter gender. This is because Ganesha is referred to as gajaratna ("a gem of an elephant"/"an excellent elephant"); the grammatical gender of ratna ("gem") in Sanskrit is neuter, and in Sanskrit grammar, an adjective has the same gendernumber, and case-ending as the noun it qualifies. This rule is quite convenient, especially in poetry, since an adjective can be placed practically anywhere in a sentence and yet it is possible to figure out precisely, more often than not, which noun it is associated with! Thus the sentence
सुशीलः बालकः उष्णं दुग्धं पिबति|
 (The well-behaved boy drinks warm milk.)
can be rewritten as  
उष्णं पिबति सुशीलः दुग्धं बालकः|
without changing its meaning. (Of course, it is possible to construct pathological examples where this idea breaks down. )

Sunday, November 3, 2013

A paradoxical doxology 2


I apologize in advance for the elephantine (see what I did there?) size of this post :) 

As you might have guessed from the title, today's snippet is yet another fine specimen of the virodhaabhaasa (विरोधाभास) trope that, loosely translated, refers to a paradox. And, just as in the previous quote, the paradox is in the second half-verse and alludes to the celebrated enmity between the lion and the elephant! It was penned by a poet called Chakra (चक्र) who hailed from Southern India and is placed in the 17th century by the renowned Sanskrit scholar T. Ganapati Sastri. Chakra's magnum opus "Jaanakeeparinaya" (जानकीपरिणय) or "The Wedding of Jaanaki (Sita)", an epic poem based on the Ramayana, begins with cleverly worded invocations to several deities  the third couplet of the work, which is excerpted below, glorifies Ganesha. My source is the scanned version of Trivandrum Sanskrit Series publication No. XXIV (1913), available here.
गजरत्नं चिरत्नं तदद्भुतं श्रेयसेस्तु यत्|
पञ्चाननो लालयति क्षोणीभृद्भूगुहाश्रयः||
Harvard-Kyoto transliteration:
gajaratnaM ciratnaM tadadbhutaM zreyase'stu yat|
paJcAnano lAlayati kSoNIbhRdbhUguhAzrayaH||

Reading 1 (self-contradictory and inadmissible): May that ancient and extraordinary gem of an elephant produce welfare  which is caressed by a lion that frequents mountainous terrain and dwells in caves

Reading 2 (admissible)May that ancient and extraordinary gem of an elephant produce welfare  which is caressed by the Five-faced Man (i.e. Shiva) in whom the Mountain-born (i.e. Parvati) and Guha (i.e. Skanda) find refuge


Notes:
1. The magic, as already stated, lies in the second hemistich "पञ्चाननो लालयति क्षोणीभृद्भूगुहाश्रयः". The second word laalayati (लालयति) is unambiguous and means "he/she/it caresses". Let us take up the remaining two words one by one.

Panchaanana (पञ्चानन): The word pancha (पञ्च), which means "five", suffixed with any word which means "face", such as aanana (आनन), vaktra (वक्त्र), mukha (मुख), aasya (आस्य) etc., is a popular appellation of Shiva since he is often represented as five-faced, especially in the Tantric tradition. The faces even have names: Ishaana (ईशान), Tatpurusha (तत्पुरुष), Aghora (अघोर), Vaamadeva (वामदेव), and Sadyojaata (सद्योजात). Each face is said to point in a particular direction, and is identified with one of the five syllables of the most important mantra (मन्त्र = sacred formula) associated with Shiva: Namah Shivaaya (नमः शिवाय). The five-headed ten-armed form of the deity is sometimes called Sadaashiva (सदाशिव). 
Five-headed Shiva, Nurpur, Himachal Pradesh, 1696

Panchaanana, as well as its above synonyms, is also another Sanskrit word for "lion"! According to lexicographers, panchaanana is figuratively used to mean "very fierce or passionate."1 It is presumably for this reason that this surprising epithet was given to the formidable, albeit one-faced, predator! But again, the 13th century Jain scholar Hamsadeva in his Mrigapakshishaastra, "The science of animals and birds", restricts the meaning of the word panchaasya (पञ्चास्य), which is semantically identical to panchaanana, to the third of the six varieties of lion he recognizes; according to him, the distinguishing characteristics of this type include whitish color, a short tail, dense body hair, a short mane, a long body, perpetual sleepiness, and a walk accompanied by frequent jumps and turning of the head. Here is the scanned version of said text for your reference. 

The last word of the verse kshoneebhRdbhooguhaashraya (क्षोणीभृद्भूगुहाश्रय) is even more interesting. Kshonee (क्षोणी) denotes the earth (and hence "soil" or "land"), and in Sanskrit any word for the earth, followed by a suffix which means "supporter" such as -dhara (-धर) or -bhRt (-भृत्), refers to a king or a mountain. It is understandable why a king would be called kshoneebhRt or "earth-supporter" his foremost duty is to sustain a piece of land and the life forms that thrive on it. But what entitles a mountain to be honored with the same epithet? Isn't it rather the other way around? One of the most important Shakta scriptures, the Devee-Bhaagavata Puraana (देवीभागवतपुराण), solves the mystery. 

"... [the earth] is called Mahî because it is great, ... . O King! the Ananta serpent is holding it on [his] thousand-hoods. To make the earth remain solid and compact, Brahmâ built at places mountains. As iron nails in a log of wood, so these hills and mountains within this earth made it fixed. Therefore the Pundits call these mountains “Mahîdhara,” holder of the earth."
– Devi-Bhagavata Purana, Book 3, Chapter 13, Verses 9-10 (link)

There is no way to know what the person/people who coined these terms actually had in mind. But it can be guessed that the "earth" here refers to the "flat" hard crust on which we live and some ancients believed that it was held in place by mountains driven, as it were, right through it so as to have their "roots" embedded in a perhaps softer substratum.

Now, bhoo (भू) is another word for "the earth", "soil", or "land" and hence the compound kshoneebhRdbhoo (क्षोणीभृद्भू) may be translated as "mountain-soil" or "hilly land." Guhaa (गुहा) means "cave" and is connected with the verb guh (गुह्), "to conceal". Finally, aashraya (आश्रय) is "shelter". Putting the pieces together, we have the first interpretation of the word: "one who uses mountainous regions and caves for shelter" – an apt description of the Asiatic lion. Here is a (by no means exhaustive) list of Sanskrit appellations of the lion that literally mean "moutain-dweller" or "mountain-wanderer": agaukas (अगौकस्), nagaukas (नगौकस्), shailaata (शैलाट), shaileya (शैलेय).

But how does the adjective under consideration relate to Shiva? The verb bhoo (भू) means "to be", "to become" or "to be born" and hence, when used as a suffix, can be interpreted as "born from" or "offspring of". So kshoneebhRdbhoo can refer to Shiva's consort Parvati who is the daughter of the mountain-king Himalaya (both the meanings "king" and "mountain" of kshoneebhRt apply here). Guha (गुह) is a popular name of Shiva and Parvati's other son Skanda (स्कन्द) or Kaartikeya (कार्तिकेय), and Shiva is, of course, "one who offers shelter to the mountain-born Parvati and Guha"! 


Somaskanda, representation of Shiva with Uma and a dancing infant Skanda (Guha),  Nayak Palace Art Museum, Tanjore
source: Wikipedia

And just in case someone fails to see why the above stanza is an illustration of virodhaabhaasa or "apparent contradiction", here is a reminder: the lion is notorious in Sanskrit literature for (supposedly) being innately hostile towards the elephant. So a lion showering love on an elephant would come across as a shocker to most readers targeted by our poet. Let me take this opportunity to present you with another list of Sanskrit names (given by lexicographers and/or used by littérateurs) of the lion: 

  • ibhaari (इभारि), kunjaraarati (कुञ्जराराति), gajaari (गजारि), dvipaari (द्विपारि), sindhuradveshin (सिन्धुरद्वेषिन्), "the enemy/hater of elephants";
  • ibhamaacala (इभमाचल), karidaaraka(करिदारक),  karimaacala(करिमाचल),  dviradaantaka (द्विरदान्तक), "elephant-destroyer";
  • garjitaasaha (गर्जितासह), "one who does not tolerate (an elephant's) trumpets"!

2. Another noteworthy feature of the couplet is the duplication of the segment ratnaM (रत्नं) in the first half-verse. Since consonants are repeated, you might be tempted to call this an instance of anupraasa. But here the embellishment consists of more than just recurring sounds; we have multiple copies of a sequence of syllables, differing in meaning. The ratna part of gajaratna means "gem" and, as a suffix to the name of a demographic or species, signifies a member enjoying a position of superiority; gajaratna means "the best among elephants" (gaja = elephant). The second ratna is part of chiratna (चिरत्न) which means "ancient" a rather obscure derivative of chira (चिर), "lasting a long time". Rhetoricians have not subsumed this special type of shabdaalankaara (शब्दालङ्कार) under anupraasa and have given it the name yamaka (यमक; literally, "twin"). In all the examples of yamaka I have seen, the repeated chunk of text spans multiples syllables and at least of the occurrences includes a complete word that may or may not be part of a compound. For instance, here the first ratna, although embedded in the longer word gajaratna, is capable of making sense on its own while the second is non-isolable since chiratna, at least in this context, cannot be broken down into chi and ratna.

We just saw that, in order to label a trope as a yamaka, the meaning or sense must be taken into account. Why then is it not considered an arthaalankaara (अर्थालङ्कार) or "embellishment of the sense"? My knowledge of the subject is limited but here goes my understanding: in a shabdaalankara, the beauty or appeal derives primarily from the sounds themselves and not from the objects or ideas they denote. More simply, a literary device qualifies as a shabdaalankaara if it is possible to make the alankaara vanish by replacing the words involved by some synonymous words or expressions. In our specimen, this can be confirmed by replacing, say, chiratna with its synonym puraana (पुराण). 

That's all for today. And in case your thirst for wordplay is still unquenched, I leave you with the assurance that the next post will be mainly about yamakas!

1 In this context, it is worthwhile to mention the related Bengali idiom 
proshongsay ponchomukh howa (Bengali: প্রশংসায় পঞ্চমুখ হওয়া) which literally means "to become five-faced (or five-mouthed) in praise" and is used to describe a person showing excessive enthusiasm in extolling someone or something.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Regaling repetitions

While the previous quote was notable for the author's deft employment of figurative speech or, to use the words of Sanskrit rhetoricians, for its arthaalankaara (अर्थालङ्कार; literally, "embellishment of the sense"), the couplet I will now present is characterized by a shabdaalankaara (शब्दालङ्कार; literally, "embellishment of the sound") which refers to the use of catchy sounds. This distich occurs as the first stanza of the naandee (नान्दी) or initial lines of benediction of the play Mukundaanandabhaana (मुकुन्दानन्दभाण) penned by one Kaasheepati Kaviraaja (काशीपति कविराज). I have no information on the playwright (ebook can be found here). 
वन्दे वन्दारुमन्दारमिन्दुभूषणनन्दनम्|
     अमन्दानन्दसन्दोहबन्धुरं सिन्धुराननम्|| 
 Harvard-Kyoto transliteration:
vande vandArumandAramindubhUSaNanandanam|
amandAnandasandohabandhuraM sindhurAnanam||


Loose translation: I extol the elephant-faced son of the one adorned with the moon -- that son who is like a wish-granting heavenly tree to those respectful of him and is charming on account of bestowing immense happiness. 
N.B. For other valid interpretations of some parts, see below.

Let us take it one word at a time:
(i) Vande (वन्दे) simply means "I praise" or "I eulogize" and is the same vande that occurs in Vande Maataram! (वन्दे मातरम्), "I praise the mother!" All the words that follow are appellations of Ganesha.

(ii) Vandaarumandaara (वन्दारुमन्दार) is a combination of two wordsVandaaru (वन्दारु), derived from the same verbal root vand (वन्द्) as वन्दे, means "one who eulogizes", hence "one who venerates", and obviously refers to the devotees of Ganesha; Mandaara (मन्दार) here denotes one of the five trees that grace Nandana (नन्दन), the garden in Indra's heaven, the other four being Paarijaata (पारिजात), Santaana (सन्तान), Kalpa (कल्प), and Harichandana (हरिचन्दन). Each of these magical plants has the distinguishing property that it can provide anyone with anything they ask for. In Sanskrit, calling someone a mandaara (or a kalpa-tree or a paarijaatais a clichéd way of glorifying their munificence. वन्दारुमन्दार thus means "generous to his votaries". Mandaara also refers to the very earthly coral tree (Erythrina variegata or E. stricta) and will reappear in a future post. 

(ii) Indubhooshananandana (इन्दुभूषणनन्दन) means "Shiva's son". Indu (इन्दु) is one of the several names of the moon and bhooshana (भूषण) is "ornament"; Shiva is called Indubhooshana (न्दुभूषण) in the above couplet because of the crescent that famously adorns his head, or his headdress if he is shown wearing one. Recall his more common synonymous epithets Chandramauli (चन्द्रमौलि) and  Chandrashekhara (चन्द्रशेखर) [चन्द्र = "the moon"; मौलि/शेखर = "crest"]. Nandana literally means "one who gladdens" but, when used as a suffix, it often refers to a son or a descendant, obviously because an offspring is supposed to bring joy to the parents. Recall Krishna's metronymic Devakeenandana (देवकीनन्दन), "the son of Devakee". And in case you are wondering, this literary device is by no means sexist since the feminine form nandinee (नन्दिनी) is used similarly to mean "daughter"! 


Chandrashekhara Moorti,
one of the 64 principal forms of Shiva popular in Tamil Shaivism 
  
(iv) Amandaanandasandohabandhura (अमन्दानन्दसन्दोहबन्धुर) can be decomposed as अमन्द+आनन्द+सन्दोह+बन्धुर. The word bandhura (बन्धुर) has many meanings including "bent", "undulating", "curved", and "rounded", and the last couple of meanings probably has something to do with its frequent use in the literature in the sense "pleasant" or "beautiful". Sandoha (सन्दोह) literally refers to the "total milking of an entire herd of cattle" (from the verbal root duh (दुह्) which means "to milk" and the prefix sam (सम्) which signifies "togetherness") but its meaning has been generalized to cover any "mass" or "multitude". Aananda (नन्द) of course means "happiness" and, interestingly, its connotations include both "spiritual bliss" and "sensual pleasure"! Manda (मन्द) is a highly negative term that can mean "slow", "dull", "feeble", "bad", "evil", or "insignificant", and amanda (अमन्द) is its antonym. Putting these together, we get "charming on account of bestowing immense happiness" (in the loose translation above) as a plausible interpretation of this long word. Another valid exegesis is "rounded on account of possessing immense happiness" or, to put it more simply, "a round bundle of joy" -- an allusion to the plump features and the delightful childlike disposition that are typically attributed to Ganesha.

(v) Sindhuraanana (सिन्धुरानन) is "elephant-faced"; sindhura (सिन्धुर) is a rather uncommon word for an elephant, while the oft-used aanana (आनन) means "face". The word सिन्धुर is particularly interesting since it literally means "a giver of सिन्धु", and it is well-known that सिन्धु refers to the Indus or a river in general. So what is the connection? It turns out that सिन्धु also denotes two different kinds of liquid discharge from an elephant's body: one through the nostrils (also called वमथु or करशीकर), and the other from a male elephant's temporal glands (also called दान or मद). References to these secretions are so common in the Sanskrit literature on Ganesha and elephants that I have decided to devote an entire post to a discussion thereof! 

Notes:
1. The particular type of shabdaalankaara used here (and, in fact, the most fundamental type of phonetic device in Sanskrit poetry) is called anupraasa (अनुप्रास). It simply refers to the repetition of one or more consonantal sounds within the same verse. English terms that come close in meaning are alliteration and consonance. Note that the conjunct consonant न्द् (composed of न् and द्) occurs eight times and the compound न्धु (comprising न्, ध्, and उ) occurs twice in the quoted couplet. There are other repetitions, too. For example,  the sequence वन्द् occurs twice at the very beginning, the consonants म्, न् and द् appear thrice in that order (-मन्दा-,-मिन्दु-, and -मन्दा- again), and there is a total of fifteen instances of न् out of which there are three pairs (in -नन्दनम्अमन्दानन्द-, and -सिन्धुराननम्). 

Obviously, the most prominent repetitions in this composition are those of  न्, द्, and ध्, all of which belong to the same phonological category -- dantya (दन्त्य) or dental consonants: for the proper utterance of these sounds, the tip of the tongue must touch the palate close to the base of the upper row of teeth. This particular sub-type of anupraasa, characterized by consonant sounds that may not be identical but have a significant similarity in pronunciation, is called shrutyanupraasa (श्रुत्यनुप्रास​). Different rhetoricians provide varying classifications of anupraasa and other sub-types may also be identified in the stanza under consideration but I will stop here since I am not an expert on the subject.

Another observation I made is that the most repeated consonants न् and द् in these opening lines also occur repetitively in the title of the play itself, मुकुन्दानन्द (see above). I would like to believe that this similarity was intentional.

2. All the words used here to describe Ganesha are long compounds; their meanings can be inferred by breaking them down into their constituents, and then combining the meanings of these constituents in accordance with certain rules, often by inserting words that do not occur in the compound itself. For instance, take the word अमन्दानन्दसन्दोहबन्धुर above which, translated verbatim to English, would read something like "not-insignificant-bliss-mass-beautiful"! This hardly makes sense unless you expand it into a phrase or clause that includes certain extraneous words. And as we have already seen, this expansion of the word, and hence the interpretation, is by no means unique. 

The grammatical tool that allows one to string smaller words together to create new words of arbitrary length is called samaasa (समास), literally "throwing together" or "condensation" -- a feature Sanskrit famously shares with German (check this out). Samaasa is definitely a powerful device for it enables a writer to express a complex idea using a single word but it can also make life difficult for the reader! Apart from the obvious problem of a word becoming a bit too long, it can produce words that are ambiguous (sometimes deliberately so), or even completely unintelligible without special training or familiarity with certain cultural elements -- we will hopefully encounter several examples of these in future posts. Nevertheless, it is these very features of Sanskrit that make the language so dear to me; every read is a fresh intellectual adventure, and you never know what a marvelous treasure trove it might be holding in store for you!

Monday, August 26, 2013

White, yellow, and red

My first offering also happens to be one of my favorites. I have come across this colorful snippet in many Sanskrit anthologies but unfortunately all are silent on the name of its ingenious creator.
शिवयोः सुधाहरिद्रादीप्तिमतोः सारभृज्जगत्पित्रोः|
 त्रिभुवनविघ्नध्वंसी करिकल्पः कश्चिदरुणिमा जयति||
Harvard-Kyoto transliteration:
zivayoH sudhAharidrAdIptimatoH sArabhRjjagatpitroH|
tribhuvanavighnadhvaMsI karikalpaH kazcidaruNimA jayati||


Loose translation: Glory to the redness that resembles an elephant, destroys obstacles in all three worlds, and bears the (combined) essence of Shiva and his wife, the parents of the universe, who possess the radiance of lime and turmeric (respectively). 
N. B. The word sudhaa (सुधा) also refers to amrita (अमृत), the drink that bestows immortality, but in this context the meaning "lime" makes most sense; haridraa (हरिद्रा) unambiguously denotes the herb turmeric (Curcuma longa) or its rhizome ground to powder and used as a spice in South Asian cuisine; त्रिभुवन or "the three worlds" obviously refers to the Earth, whatever lies above, and whatever lies below. 

I admit that the literal translation above does not throw much light on what the poet is trying to say, so here is a more detailed explanation. Shiva is white like lime (not the fruit but the calcium-compound obtained from limestone or chalk), his wife (known by various names such as Parvati and Uma) is yellow like the interior of a turmeric tuber, and their offspring Ganesha has a red-skinned human torso topped with a white elephant-head. So the poet, in his indirect supplication to Ganesha to obliterate all difficulty, compares the glorious deity to the red substance that is produced when turmeric powder is mixed with slaked lime. Here is a brief description of the underlying chemical process with a lot of scientific jargon (but sadly no equation) thrown in.



It was this clever use of a remarkable observation without getting too wordy that made the couplet under consideration stand out to me. The following are some other observations I  have made on the form and content of this verse (and all my posts will follow this pattern).

Notes:
1. The verb used here, jayati (जयति), literally translates to "he/she/it is victorious" but , when used in paeans or benedictions, it is best interpreted as the equivalent of the English expressions "Glory to him/her!" and "Hail him/her!" A more common way of achieving the same effect is to use the imperative form of the verb jayatu (जयतु; literally, "may he/she/it be victorious") or to call upon the deity directly and chant jaya! (जय, literally, "may you be victorious"). This is the origin of several popular Indian slogans like Jai Hind! and "Jaya He" in the Indian national anthem.  

2. In the above couplet, Ganesha is nowhere mentioned by name and is merely described as "करिकल्पः कश्चिद् अरुणिमा" that translates to "some elephant-like redness". This expression might sound rather odd to a reader unfamiliar with Indic literature but such circumlocutions were far from frowned upon by critics of classical poetry. One can often find the author of a hymn referring to their object of adoration by the word vastu (वस्तु; literally, "entity") or mahas (महस् ; literally, "power" or "greatness") accompanied by a word that means "some", and then making up for the deliberate vagueness of their word choice with a slew of ornate adjectives that collectively pinpoint the deity

3. Another interesting aspect of this excerpt is the use of a masculine word in the dual-number form to denote a conjugal couple. The word जगत्पित्रोः comes from the root गत्पितृ (जगत् = world/universe; पितृ = father) and should be taken to mean "of the father and mother of the universe" rather than "of the two fathers of the universe". Likewise शिवयोः means "of Shiva and his wife", the latter having Shivaa (शिवा) as one of her numerous names.

4. Some readers might find the complexions of Shiva's family mentioned above incompatible with what they have seen or heard. After all, we are talking about three of the principal deities of Hinduism. Religious and occult works like PuraanasAagamas, and Tantras as well as local folklore attribute a plethora of Roopas (रूप) or manifestations and Avataaras (अवतार) or incarnations with widely differing physical features to each of them. In modern-day poster art, Shiva is shown blue-skinned more often than not; his wife is fair (though not necessarily having a yellowish tinge) in Northern India but dark, often dark green, in many Southern temple depictions; and the versatile elephant-headed god now comes in all possible shapes, sizes, and hues! But according to most of the textual traditions that I am aware of, the common forms of Shiva, Uma, and Ganesha -- the forms in which they permanently inhabit their mountain abode Kailaasa, and not the special-purpose forms in which they transiently appear in order to grant boons to devotees or kill demons, or esoteric forms meditated upon by practitioners of occult rituals -- are white, fair (whitish or golden-yellow), and red respectively. I will probably talk more about Ganesha's association with the color red in later posts. Below you can see a fine specimen of the Kalighat Patachitra school of painting (that flourished in 19th century Calcutta) depicting the three mythological characters in the three hues mentioned above.

 The Hindu Holy Family

5. The connection between turmeric and Ganesha's mother deserves some attention here. This herb shares a name with Shiva's light-skinned consort: Umaa (उमा), which is a word of obscure etymology but is assigned the meanings "light" and "splendor" by lexicographers. Moreover, a popular name of the goddess is Gauree (गौरी), "the fair lady", while the neuter-gender form gauram (गौरम्) counts "turmeric" among its meanings. 

In Bengal, the ten-armed Durga (दुर्गा) is traditionally identified with Shiva's wife Gauree, the daughter of the mountain-god Himaalaya (हिमालय) and his wife Menakaa (मेनका). According to local folklore, she visits her parents' house (that is identified with the world of mortals) with her children every year in early autumn during the four-day Durga Puja ceremony, the single most important festival of the Bengali Hindu community. An important ritual of the Puja is to tie parts of nine sacred plants into a structure called the Navapatrikaa (नवपत्रिका) and worship it as the combined representation of nine emanations of the Mother Goddess; one of these vegetable components is a turmeric tuber that is said to inhabited by Durga herself. Moreover, the colossal clay idols of Durga in her demon-slaying pose that are at the center of the Puja festivities are traditionally painted the color of turmeric!

In certain rituals, Gauree is symbolized by an idol made of turmeric or simply by the rhizome of the plant. This representation is called Haridraa Gauree (हरिद्रागौरी) in Sanskrit and arishinada gauri in Kannada (haridraa and arishina being the names of turmeric in the respective languages). It is particularly common in Karnataka and some other South Indian states during a festival, observed mainly by women, known as Gowri Habba or Swarna Gauree Vrata (स्वर्णगौरीव्रत) in Karnataka, and Hartalika Teej in the Northern states and parts of Maharashtra. The primary purpose of this religious observance (like most others involving women as the principal participants) seems to be ensure that the female worshiper secures a suitable groom if she is single and a long, healthy, and prosperous life for the husband if she is already married. The Bhavishyottara Puraana (भविष्योत्तरपुराण) speaks of the Mangala Gauree Vrata (मङ्गलगौरीव्रत), another vrata (व्रत) or religious vow dedicated to the Goddess, and for this vrata too, the turmeric Gauree can be used as the chief article of worship. 

Turmeric is considered a mangaladravya (मङ्गलद्रव्य) or auspicious item in Hindu tradition and is an essential ingredient of several rites in wedding ceremonies, which adds another dimension to its association with the patron of marriage and bestower of a woman's continued marital bliss. The interested reader can find out more about the ceremonial uses of the turmeric tuber and the powder and paste obtained from it herehere, and here

6. And finally, a few words about the red stuff that is at the heart of the above composition. Kumkum or something similar-sounding is the generic name given in many Indo-Aryan and Sanskrit-influenced languages to a red-colored powder or paste used for multiple ritual purposes, often alongside turmeric. One of the several methods for preparing this stuff is to put turmeric and lime together. Since this red substance is believed to possess magical welfare-inducing and evil-averting powers, its comparison to Ganesha probably goes more than skin-deep!

In Kerala, this turmeric-lime mixture is of considerable importance in the cult of the wrathful goddess Bhadrakaalee (भद्रकाली) and is sometimes sacrificially offered to her in  the liquid form as a substitute for one's blood (find out more here and here). It is also used in  the powdered form as a red pigment for making elaborate drawings or kalams of said goddess and other local deities on the floor -- an art form called Kalamezhuthu (check this and this out) in which traditionally only five colors are allowed.